Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1002

reference
873-tree-1
name
1002
tree-preservation-order

undefined

873-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.040432 50.873796)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.040361 50.873788,-1.040364 50.873802,-1.040374 50.873815,-1.040390 50.873825,-1.040409 50.873831,-1.040431 50.873834,-1.040453 50.873832,-1.040473 50.873825,-1.040489 50.873815,-1.040500 50.873803,-1.040503 50.873789,-1.040500 50.873775,-1.040490 50.873763,-1.040475 50.873753,-1.040455 50.873746,-1.040433 50.873744,-1.040411 50.873746,-1.040391 50.873752,-1.040375 50.873762,-1.040365 50.873774,-1.040361 50.873788)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL